First, take a look at this fabulous painting:
Claude Monet’s “The Magpie” – created sometime between 1868-1869
Here’s the story:
Monet decided that he needed to focus on capturing the essence of winter in his paintings in these unusually cold winters of the late 1860s. Other painters were devoted to creating little “sonnets of snow” on their canvases and Monet was inspired by their works.
So. Monet went out in all weather to see what he could see. On one particular occasion sometime in 1868-9, his startled neighbor, writing to a friend, described how he was walking along his property line to check on some trees. Instead, he found the painter, in the dead of winter, painting outside with three greatcoats wrapped on top of each other, a thick scarf, several pairs of (fingerless?) gloves, and a tiny little heater trained on his feet. The neighbor wrote it was “cold enough to split rocks” but still Monet painted on, seemingly oblivious to the conditions, casually wiping off the snow that fell on his canvas.
Why was he out there? Certainly not for the acclaim. Monet, at the time, was still considered a lunatic and his work rejected for salon exhibitions, so paintings like “The Magpie” would not fetch a high price or help gain him acceptance in the art world.
I like to think of Monet as purely inspired in all that he sketched or painted – brilliant artists have always had a vision that extends far beyond the petty limitations of popular society and instead speaks to something far more essential inside all of us. If it wasn’t for his artistic zeal which permitted him to withstand all conditions, criticisms, and those moments of great doubt, would we be able to have such a tangible understanding of the world that once was? Of the country slowly changing from ‘sonnets of snow’ to plumes of railroad smoke? His art was not just for him, but to mark a moment, a lifestyle, a land that is now precious to so many people – dreamers and historians alike.
We certainly want to believe that all artists are as devoted to their craft and surely the great ones still are. But, are there as many dreamers, as many Claude Monets today? Have we become so spoiled that this same painting could be created today from a digital photograph? Does it matter that the sacrifice is not the same? Who is Claude Monet in 2010? I may not have the answers to these questions, but I do have a renewed appreciation for this little bird perched on a gate between the wild countryside and a quiet estate.
What a beautiful painting! Thank you for sharing it. And to your questions, several thoughts come to mind:
ReplyDelete*I don't think that photography can replace any painting, and vice versa; they are just separate, respectable art forms, admired as art, but for different reasons. One may seem easier than the other, or not take as long for some as it does for others, but I'm not sure if its appreciation is affected. For me, it's not.
*And, as an audience member, I find a lot of value in the backstory surrounding an artist's creative journey, or in the contextual process involving any work of art (literary included). For me, understanding part of the artist's reality brings more meaning to the work itself (I forget which literary theory this is...), so the sacrifice Monet made to create this painting is very important because it heightens the piece (although the painting can obviously be enjoyed and admired without any knowledge of the circumstances surrounding it, I think knowing the background adds value to it). The story you shared furthers one's perception and emotional response to the work itself, inciting a deeper connection to it. It makes us wonder: what would we be willing to sacrifice for? For Monet, it was art, and at the very least, we can respect Monet a bit more to know he suffered in the freezing cold for art's sake.
Thanks, Shelley!
ReplyDeleteIn terms of the photograph, I meant to say that if Monet had just snapped a photo and then painted this painting from the image...would that be a way to avoid his time outside? Would it be a different painting knowing that he hadn't stood outside to see the light for himself?
I think you bring up a good point that the story behind a painting is sometimes as important as the painting itself...after all much of contemporary art relies on background knowledge of the artist's vision/manifesto in order to fully appreciate their zips, drips, and the like.
You can go and see "The Magpie," along with a fair number of other Monets and other impressionists, at the de Young Museum in San Francisco right now.
ReplyDeleteThanks Anon., I did visit the exhibit! :)
ReplyDelete